Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3CD6E41B.4060707@No.ece.Spam.gatech.Please.edu> Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 16:14:19 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: gmane.os.cygwin To: Glenn Randers-Pehrson CC: perlspinr AT att DOT net, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: libpng changes...again. [Was: Re: I~M~-build tips Site corrections tobe made] References: <3CD6E1A2 DOT 39755B38 AT comcast DOT net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Glenn Randers-Pehrson wrote: > > I'm not removing pkgconfig/libpng.pc > > I am merely adding bin/libpng-config for anyone who wants it. > You are free to ignore libpng-config. Yes, I just got finished reading the last two weeks of png-implement. (Next I'll start on the US Tax Code...). I misunderstood your earlier email; it sounded like png-config was going to *replace* pkg-config/libpng*.pc, which would definitely be a step backwards IMO. However, *adding* a png-config is not a bad idea at all; people seem to be more comfortable with scripting around those in client configure.in's for some reason. As I said, I'm all better now. Move along, nothin' to see here... --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/