Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Dockeen" To: , Subject: Cygwin/GCC Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 08:32:33 +0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Do you know something I don't. As far as I know, there is no such things as gcc-3.1. gcc-3.1 is under release testing as we speak, and has not officially been released yet...I have built it under Cygwin a number of times myself. The latest "official" release of gcc is gcc-3.0.4. Did you mean gcc-3.0.1 and 3.0.2? When I have built 3.1, I build g77 and the C,C++ compilers only, I don't mess with Java (which Cygwin isn't really set up to handle yet), Ada (new for 3.1) or Objective C. On my work laptop, which is a Pentium 3, 1.1 Ghz, I can build do the configure/make bootstrap/ make install dance in about 30 - 40 minutes, on my home play machine, which is a P2/400, it takes from 1 - 2 hours, much of the time in the make part of the cycle. If you want, I can send you my "recipe" for building gcc-3.1 in this way. I have not built gcc-3.1 on the work SGI's, I know that gsl, which alos takes a long time to build, takes comparable time on the SGI as it does on Cygwin. Wayne Keen -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/