Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20020502205025.0267f278@pop.ma.ultranet.com> X-Sender: lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 20:52:47 -0400 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" Subject: Re: New snapshot with significant new functionality In-Reply-To: <20020503003040.GA712@redhat.com> References: <00ea01c1f237$8c421a70$0100a8c0 AT advent02> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20020502163048 DOT 026f8bb0 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <00ea01c1f237$8c421a70$0100a8c0 AT advent02> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 08:30 PM 5/2/2002, you wrote: >On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 01:14:52AM +0100, Chris January wrote: > >> Chris & Chris, > >> > >> Cool! > >> > >> Is the registry as reflected in /proc/registry writable? > >I'm torn between writing "no", and "no, not yet". > >The problem with this is that it is inevitable that at some point or other > >someone will post to the cygwin mailing list complaining they typed rm -rf > >/proc/registry/* and now their system is hosed and it's all Red Hat's > >fault... > >Yeah, I'd be waiting for that. > >Right now, I'm waiting for the first "I upgraded cygwin and now my /proc >directory has strange stuff in it!" message. How'd you know that's what I see now? You're psychic! Oh and since I found all this stuff in /proc, I did do a 'rm -rf' on it but it didn't work. Please fix this real soon! I want all this disk space back!! ;-) ;-) ;-) Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/