Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <000801c1f1a0$d2116020$6fc82486@medschool.dundee.ac.uk> Reply-To: From: To: Cc: Subject: Re: New snapshot with significant new functionality Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 07:15:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 No problems, but is all the following expected behaviour? Having uncompressed the new .dll and copied it to /bin: 1. had to make /proc using mkdir /proc 2. ls -al / doesn't actually show /proc 3. ls -al /proc shows (something like) dr-xr-xr-x 10 0 medicine 0 Jan 1 1970 1951627 dr-xr-xr-x 10 0 medicine 0 Jan 1 1970 2022611 dr-xr-xr-x 7 0 medicine 0 May 2 07:11 registry -r--r--r-- 1 0 medicine 0 May 2 07:11 uptime -r--r--r-- 1 0 medicine 0 May 2 07:11 version 4. Note lack of . and .. 5. ls -al /proc/1951627 shows a lot of stuff, but 6. ls -al /proc/2022611 gives ls: /proc/2022611: No such file or directory If this is all what /should/ happen then that's fine (and please excuse naive questioning). Fergus -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/