Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <00d101c1ef70$5ffe6e10$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: "Cliff Hones" , References: <20020429050712 DOT GC27298 AT redhat DOT com> <001501c1ef4c$57d340e0$0101a8c0 AT albion> Subject: Re: setup 2.194.2.24: Bug (?) in downloading from internet Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 21:24:05 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Apr 2002 11:23:59.0505 (UTC) FILETIME=[5B968010:01C1EF70] === ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cliff Hones" To: > > Now Sam Edge is taking the same path. Good luck. > > What would happen if someone did produce a version of setup identical > to the current, except for the removal of redownload? Would it > be adopted? As it stands, I don't know. I've asked everyone to write in and say whether they use the redownload capability. > One gets an unfortunate undercurrent from this list that > if it wasn't approved by the right people it might be suppressed > (and left to circulate on the black market - possibly the worst > scenario). Heh, this is open source, there is no black market :}. Realistically, anyone can use anything they want to install, but 'you' the users have a realistic expectation that 'we' the developers will provide a tool, and support that tool. Conversely we expect that anyone wanting assistance with install will use our provided tool. Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/