Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: lehrig AT t-online DOT de (Rainer Lehrig) To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: What do you think about a cygOpenVMS ? Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 14:56:58 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200204251456.58686.lehrig@t-online.de> X-Sender: 340067594915-0001 AT t-dialin DOT net Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g3PFHOs20818 Hi, I have been working a long time on OpenVMS systems. These systems are very stable and used frequently in process automation. But since Compaq took over Digital equipment I have the feeling that it is not developed actively any longer. So what do you think about something like CYGWIN for OpenVMS ? OpenVMS has: - X-Windows - at least a subset of posix calls - pthread routines - Socket library, telnet, ftp, rsh, samba ... - A different filesystem ( device:[topdir.subdir]filename.extension;version ) I have ported QT2.2.0 to OpenVMS (this was really straigt forward) The only problem was the different syntax in the filenames. In principle "all" one would need, is a running bash with all the necessary posix calls. In this case even KDE should not be a problem. Is there some interest for a project called CYGVMS ??? Yours: Rainer Lehrig -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/