Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 21:02:35 -0400
From: rich-paul AT rich-paul DOT net
To: "Larry Hall \(RFK Partners, Inc\)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Outlaw Cygwin Install
Message-ID: <20020423210235.A18362@monster.rich-paul.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.16i
In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20020423162731.0276d7b0@pop.ma.ultranet.com>; from lhall@rfk.com on Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 04:39:03PM -0400
X-Operating-System: Linux monster 2.4.17-SMPs

> That works so long as the users come to that site to install and that site
> for support of the install.  The current Cygwin policy is to offer email 
> "support" for software it distributes.  It's impractical to do otherwise.
> Also, the hope is that people who want to add features to anything Cygwin
> offers will do so in the context of the existing facilities.  In this case, 
> the desire is that people will enhance setup vs making some home-grown thing.
> This list would obviously entertain questions on install issues from the
> Cygwin distributed setup, no matter what functionality it has.  So the 
> policy that you see as being not liberal enough is one that merely attempts
> to keep the group focused both in a software development sense and in a 
> support sense.  It doesn't exclude functionality.  It just seeks to add it
> in the framework that exists already.  I hope that makes some sense to you.
> 

Sure.  I don't have a problem with the list policy.  If somebody
got one of my products, hacked or misused it, and then tried to
get me to fix 'bugs', I wouldn't be too friendly.  That's why I
thought a separate list for unsupported uses might be in order. I
didn't intend to criticize.

The reasons I didn't contribute what I'd done back to cygwin are
pretty clear if you've read the thing:  It's a butt ugly hack,
and it's not really general.  It does exactly what I need, but I
suspect that most people don't need that.   Actually, there's a
third reason, which is that when I use this hack, I install a
great deal of non-cygwin software that I have no right to
distribute or contribute, so even if somebody did put similar
functionality into setup.exe, I would probably have to continue
to do an ugly hack on my own.

-- 
Got freedom?  Vote Libertarian:  http://www.lp.org

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/