Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Sam Edge To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Is Cygwin legal under Windows XP? Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:31:04 +0100 Organization: . Message-ID: References: <4471243492 DOT 20020421095401 AT familiehaase DOT de> <3CC24897 DOT 10238 DOT 884BE175 AT localhost> In-Reply-To: <3CC24897.10238.884BE175@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Posting-Agent: Hamster/1.3.23.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g3LAVvD17830 You wrote in <3CC24897 DOT 10238 DOT 884BE175 AT localhost> in gmane.os.cygwin on Sun, 21 Apr 2002 05:05:27 -0500: > Or, Web servers which download Java, Javascript and ASP's. Download is okay - the code is running on the remote machine and needs a local (Java/.NET/ActiveX/WSH) licence to run there. I think you mean server-side DHTML. (Of course you can't run IIS on workstation versions of Win32 anyway.)The licence agreement does seem to suggest that you can't run CGI or PHP or other server-side code on Apache on XP Pro. Linux, anyone? ;-) > What concerns me is the the apparent stricture on any non-MS > remote access to one's own PC via sshd! I guess this would > even make PCAnywhere connections from a non-XP host illegal > w/o an additional XP license. Absolutely. From a straightforward reading it precludes peer-to-peer file sharing too. (Anyway, we're drifting off-topic so I'll stop.) -- Sam Edge -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/