Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 18:38:27 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: I am not going to let cygwin BSOD my Windows 2000 Server Message-ID: <20020420223827.GA9745@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20020420070212 DOT GA3256 AT redhat DOT com> <20020420163557 DOT GB3256 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 01:51:36PM -0400, George Hester wrote: >Sort of. Maybe it does work for 99% of the people out there. I know >nothing of that. And yes, my toes are sensitive to things such as this. If >I lose my op sys it takes me months to get it back to the condition I had >before its destruction. You may not believe me but I assure you that is the >case. If setup.exe causes such horrendous destruction to your system, then I think it's very likely that Cygwin will do the same. I suggest that maybe Cygwin is not something that you want to mess with. Again, since no one else has to reinstall their system after running setup, I think I am on pretty safe grounds assuming that this is *your* problem. If I was you, I'd be very alarmed about the instability of my system and I would be doing whatever possible to stabilize it. Cygwin setup is the least of your worries. My crystal ball tells me that your response to this is probably going to be something like "I only have this problem with Cygwin's setup.exe!" Well, then you should be thanking us for providing you this valuable tool which is alerting you to serious problems on your system. I think you should take a few steps back and ensure that you are running the most up-to-date version of Windows possible. If you are running W2K, make sure that you have installed all of the service packs. Ditto for any other Windows version. You might also want to invest in something like Norton Systemworks which has diagnostic tools that may help narrow down what's wrong with your system. There may also be info and tools downloadable at www.sysinternals.com. Other people have said this, but I am going to repeat it: If you get a BSOD from running an unprivileged program, then there is something wrong with your system. This is slightly less true if you are running a Windows 9x version of the "OS" but, even there, it is likely to be something wrong with your setup. The bottom line is that should not be possible for a simple user app like setup.exe to cause this level of destruction. >The information I have garnered here has helped to maybe stick my toes in >the fire again. I will wait a while and see if there is any good soul that >can explain the procedures for a manual setup. And if that is pie in the sky >then at that point I will decide if walking around with a few less toes is >worth it. You really like to beat an analogy into the ground don't you? Again, I think that you'll have lots of trouble if you try to install cygwin manually. I really don't believe that you'll be happy with the results. It's entirely possible that this just isn't the project for you. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/