Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Path: not-for-mail From: "George Hester" Newsgroups: gmane.os.cygwin Subject: Re: I am not going to let cygwin BSOD my Windows 2000 Server Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 13:51:36 -0400 Lines: 58 Message-ID: References: <20020420070212 DOT GA3256 AT redhat DOT com> <20020420163557 DOT GB3256 AT redhat DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: alb-24-58-149-69.nycap.rr.com X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019325111 26422 24.58.149.69 (20 Apr 2002 17:51:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 17:51:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Sort of. Maybe it does work for 99% of the people out there. I know nothing of that. And yes, my toes are sensitive to things such as this. If I lose my op sys it takes me months to get it back to the condition I had before its destruction. You may not believe me but I assure you that is the case. The information I have garnered here has helped to maybe stick my toes in the fire again. I will wait a while and see if there is any good soul that can explain the procedures for a manual setup. And if that is pie in the sky then at that point I will decide if walking around with a few less toes is worth it. Thanks. -- George Hester _________________________________ "Christopher Faylor" wrote in message news:20020420163557 DOT GB3256 AT redhat DOT com... > On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 03:19:40AM -0400, George Hester wrote: > >Do you have all your toes? > > Sure. My toes are not so sensitive that they become burned off if > I encounter a problem with my system. > > I'm also the kind of guy who thinks that if something is working for 99% > of the people out there and *I* have a problem that it is probably *my* > problem. So, often, I like to figure out what that problem is. > Sometimes, if I don't have enough time or interest, I might wait to see > if a new version of a program solves my problem but I never grow so > averse to trying something new that I steadfastly avoid running a > program because it once gave me problems. > > Does that answer your question? > > cgf > > >_________________________________ > >"Christopher Faylor" wrote in message > >news:20020420070212 DOT GA3256 AT redhat DOT com... > >> On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 02:51:45AM -0400, George Hester wrote: > >> >Suggestion. Let's consider a Manual Install Direction for us weenies > >> >that lost a few toes trying to install this software in the past. > >> > >> You're making things way too hard for yourself. Just run setup.exe > >> and select "Install" rather than "Download". Then everything will > >> be installed automatically. You don't have to unzip/bunzip anything > >> by hand. setup.exe has *never* required a manual step like this. > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/