Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 20:00:36 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: Michael A Chase <mchase AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Bug in setup.exe 2.194.2.24
Message-ID: <20020420000036.GB30156@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: Michael A Chase <mchase AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>,
	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20020419174104 DOT GH22290 AT fairlite DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> <E16yd1d-00028f-00 AT tisch DOT mail DOT mindspring DOT net> <E16yhd0-0006EO-00 AT smtp10 DOT atl DOT mindspring DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E16yhd0-0006EO-00@smtp10.atl.mindspring.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 04:17:01PM -0700, Michael A Chase wrote:
>On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 18:01:34 -0400 Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote:
>>However, if Robert indicates that this is not the desired behavior then
>>maybe someone else (*cough*, Michael, *cough*) might have time to look
>>into this?
>
>I'll look into it this evening.  Not sure if I'll be able to figure it
>out though.  I seem to have trouble leaving the old procedural
>paradigm.

Thanks.  Looks like my clever subliminal hint worked.

I obviously didn't mean to imply that Robert couldn't or wouldn't look
into this but I know he's been busy...

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/