Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <006f01c1e4aa$3c99cc10$312a2a0a@CR551617A> From: "Warren Postma" To: "J. Grant" Cc: References: <3CBA5348 DOT 5030805 AT jguk DOT org> Subject: Re: GNU/Windows Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 14:20:35 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [24.103.120.193] using ID at Mon, 15 Apr 2002 14:20:38 -0400 Quoth JG: > Hello RMS, > I agree with your postion on calling a Linux system GNU/Linux. ... I think we should all refer to his Stallman-ness, as "GNU/RMS". As for Cygwin, I think the RedHat representative said it best: It's their baby, so they get to name it. In the case of the Linux kernel, Linus owns it, and Linus named it. Thanks to GNU/RMS, for GNU/EMACS, which I never GNUse if I don't have to. VI Forever! Warren -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/