Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 13:21:35 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ncftp current release won't run - missing CYGREADLINE5.DLL Message-ID: <20020403182135.GE7542@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20020403160028 DOT GL4053 AT redhat DOT com> <20020403160028 DOT GL4053 AT redhat DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20020403114503 DOT 0263aa60 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20020403114503.0263aa60@pop.ma.ultranet.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 12:00:50PM -0500, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote: >In any case, there is no outstanding issue here. It's all been >addressed before and the solution exists. It doesn't need to be >invented. Unless a serious problem arises again with the previously >prescribed approach in the FAQ, there's no benefit to this list in >continuing the discussion of solutions to this issue. I may be wrong >but I believe that was the point that Chris was trying to get across. I was actually trying to stop the spread of *false* information. The message that I responded to was giving the impression that one should avoid running setup.exe since it would randomly delete DLLs. I hate for things like that to show up in the archives since, invariably, someone will use it as a rationale for complicating their lives somewhere down the line. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/