Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3CA35209.DF78CD8D@sacet.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 18:25:29 +0100
From: Herve Bailly <herve DOT bailly AT sacet DOT com>
Organization: SACET
X-Accept-Language: fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Time function implementations for cygwin
References: <3CA325D4 DOT E284A9F4 AT sacet DOT com> <20020328153817 DOT GE11781 AT redhat DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

                    Hello,
    My question was bad asked. Time functions are very usefull for my
application. And I would like to know if time functions are not implemented
because of unsovable problems with Windows or if they will  be implemented
in a near feature.
    Thank you for any response.
    Herve BAILLY

Christopher Faylor a écrit :

> On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 03:16:52PM +0100, Herve Bailly wrote:
> >I would like to know if functions like "clock_gettime", "clock_getres",
> >"nanosleep", time_out for "select" or "sem_wait" functions, are
> >implemented in CYGWIN.
>
> This is your second message on the subject.  It's easy enough to figure
> this out for yourself.  Why do you need someone to tell you yes or no?
>
> For the record, clock_*, nanosleep, and time-out are not implemented.
>
> cgf


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/