Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 10:38:17 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc: herve DOT bailly AT sacet DOT com
Subject: Re: Time function implementations for cygwin
Message-ID: <20020328153817.GE11781@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, herve DOT bailly AT sacet DOT com
References: <3CA325D4 DOT E284A9F4 AT sacet DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3CA325D4.E284A9F4@sacet.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 03:16:52PM +0100, Herve Bailly wrote:
>I would like to know if functions like "clock_gettime", "clock_getres",
>"nanosleep", time_out for "select" or "sem_wait" functions, are
>implemented in CYGWIN.

This is your second message on the subject.  It's easy enough to figure
this out for yourself.  Why do you need someone to tell you yes or no?

For the record, clock_*, nanosleep, and time-out are not implemented.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/