Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 23:57:11 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cygwin1.dll bug in ftime (patch included)
Message-ID: <20020328045711.GA6521@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <000901c1d47a$82984380$0610a8c0 AT wyw>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <000901c1d47a$82984380$0610a8c0@wyw>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 11:58:00AM +0800, Wu Yongwei wrote:
>I did not submit a patch because I did not think you will accept it.
>Writing the patch itself is easy: it was already there in an old CVS
>version.  Or almost so.  Notice that I do not always call tzset.  My
>previous experience with MSVC indicates that calling tzset is costly.
>I am not sure of the case with Cygwin.  However, it is just there for
>you to review.

Applied.  Thanks.

FYI, I wrote a proper ChangeLog entry and attributed this change to you
in the ChangeLog.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/