Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: Strange behavior of MSVC's printf under cygwin shell?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 19:15:10 +1100
Message-ID: <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA76008ABA5@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: "Pietro Toniolo" <ptoniolo AT tin DOT it>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g2Q8GbV05370



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pietro Toniolo [mailto:ptoniolo AT tin DOT it] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 7:04 PM

> Is it an "undefined behavior" of the c compiler?
> But why a different default behavior, with and without the flag?

You get a different C library with, and without the flag.

'nuff said.

Rob

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/