Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Path: not-for-mail
From: Pietro Toniolo <ptoniolo AT tin DOT it>
Newsgroups: gmane.os.cygwin
Subject: Re: Strange behavior of MSVC's printf under cygwin shell?
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 09:04:17 +0100
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <3CA02B81.8D679A34@tin.it>
References: <LAW2-OE53WO6hm8Ua8d000018b3 AT hotmail DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20020325164805 DOT 02361a90 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.140.15.170
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1017129858 12374 213.140.15.170 (26 Mar 2002 08:04:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 08:04:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-Accept-Language: en,it

"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:

> The problem must be at your end.  I don't see it here.  Looks like you'll
> need to debug it more.

Nay, I campiled the proposed program (every package on my side is in the
"Last" status) and, with -no-cygwin, I do have an unbuffered stdout.

Is it an "undefined behavior" of the c compiler?
But why a different default behavior, with and without the flag?



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/