Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 21:52:10 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cygwin1.dll bug in ftime
Message-ID: <20020326025210.GE29706@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <001501c1d470$7b0b7a60$0610a8c0 AT wyw>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <001501c1d470$7b0b7a60$0610a8c0@wyw>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:45:32AM +0800, Wu Yongwei wrote:
>Hope I am clear enough. I am arguing here for a BETTER Cygwin.

I guess I wasn't clear enough.

SUPPLY A PATCH TO FIX THE BEHAVIOR.

If you want me, or anyone else to fix it, you'll undoubtedly have a long
wait.  Especially since you have now polarized me by arguing points when
you could have been investigating the code and supplying a fix.

No arguments in the world work better than an actual patch.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/