Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3C986BFF.3B2B4CF2@lapo.it> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 12:01:19 +0100 From: Lapo Luchini X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: it,en,fr,es,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mailing List: CygWin Subject: Re: RFP: NASM References: <00c501c1cfde$69741870$6401a8c0 AT apprentice> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > *shrug* they have a forum - the version compiles with cygwin without a > hitch... most recent is 0.98.22 (I'm pretty sure) I see they're distributing a .tar.gz with some cygwin utility (cvs.exe, cyggdbm.dll, cygwin1.dll, cygz.dll, ssh*.exe; of course withour sources) so they indeed know of cygwin existence, but of course they didn't suppose that being an "official package" was so easy... I think the best think is to contact them to ask if they want to mantain NASM package themself and moreover politely pointing out that they should point to the setup instead of having a tarball with some utilities packaged... who volunteers? 0=) -- Lapo 'Raist' Luchini lapo AT lapo DOT it (PGP & X.509 keys available) http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/