Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20020318162408.021a6a40@pop.ma.ultranet.com> X-Sender: lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 16:26:23 -0500 To: "Chris January" , From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" Subject: Re: Any chance of upping MAX_DELQUEUES_PENDING? In-Reply-To: <002101c1cec3$0b0cb010$0100a8c0@advent02> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 04:22 PM 3/18/2002, Chris January wrote: >Why is MAX_DELQUEUES_PENDING set only to 100? Sometimes I want to delete >more than 100 files (quite often in fact). Any good reason for this or is it >an arbitary limit? If so, could it be upped to something a bit larger >please? >It seems the current limit of 100 was chosen arbitarily by Geoffrey Noer in >1998. >Just out of curiosity, why is there a deletion queue in the first place? >Also, Geoffrey mentions that having an array of a fixed size is bad in the >FIXME comment at the top of delqueue.cc. Is there any reason this has not >been re-implemented as a linked list (for example), yet? (other than lack of >contributors to do it) See the FAQ entry: Why do I get a message saying Out of Queue slots? http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_4.html#SEC65 It's an oldie but a goodie! ;-) Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/