Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020317113217.024118a8@pop3.cris.com>
X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 11:37:28 -0800
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
Subject: Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] Revamped spam blocking for this mailing
  list
In-Reply-To: <20020317192306.GA28054@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Chris,

This is just my personal opinion, obviously, but there wasn't enough spam 
getting through of late to seem to justify messing with a working system.

The truth? I've been blocked inappropriately in the past, on this list and 
others, and it is pretty much at the top of my list of pet peeves! Perhaps 
it's part of the American psyche, but I become almost apoplectic when I'm 
muzzled in any way!

The other truth? I'm writing this to see if I'm going to get blocked under 
the new scheme or software you've instituted. Better on this low-content 
message than on one I really want to be read.

Here goes...

Randall Schulz
Mountain View, CA USA


At 11:23 2002-03-17, you wrote:
>I've just crossed my fingers and set up the cygwin and cygwin-apps mailing 
>lists to use some revamped spam blocking software that I've written for 
>sources.redhat.com.
>
>...
>
>FYI,
>cgf


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/