Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20020314205423.024ed580@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-Sender: lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:56:00 -0500
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
Subject: Re: Having problems with sshd and user accounts?  1.3.10   
  appears to be broken, 1.3.9 fixed it...
In-Reply-To: <20020315012353.GB15246@redhat.com>
References: <3C914380 DOT 9020508 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
 <a6qeii$49m$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org>
 <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20020314101743 DOT 01ca4ff0 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
 <3C914380 DOT 9020508 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 08:23 PM 3/14/2002, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 07:42:40PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
> >>Thank goodness someone has found the Cygwin release that's a panacea
> >>for all subsequent Cygwin ills! I'd heard B20 touted as this for so
> >>long that I was afraid Cygwin would never reach such heights again.
> >>Boy am I relieved! I guess there's no need for further Cygwin releases,
> >>since 1.3.9 is now the cure all (actually, this makes me wonder why
> >>there were any releases after B20....) Anybody have any idea what would
> >>be a good use of the newly freed
> >>
> >>up time of members of this group?
> >
> >
> >LOL!
>
>Ditto.
>
> >Although, the XEmacs-centric crowd has been recommending "stay at
> >1.3.2" for some time, now.  So unfortunately, 1.3.9 is NOT a complete
> >panacea.  We *may* actually have to keep developing cygwin...mebbe
> >1.3.11 will be all the juicy goodness of 1.3.2 + 1.3.9, and then we can
> >stop?
>
>Yes.  I've heard that.  They broke something in Xemacs so that it stopped
>working with 1.3.3+.
>
>I think it's ttys or maybe processes or something.  There is definitely some
>kind of problem there that one of the developers should check into.  I'd
>do it but I don't get paid to work on Xemacs!
>
>I hope this helps someone track down the problem, at least.  Unfortunately
>I have no more time to help and I only know how to program cygwin, myself,
>anyway.


I was thinking of asking Santa for the solution but I'm not sure I can wait
that long.  Maybe the Easter Bunny can help...



Larry Hall                              lhall AT rfk DOT com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      http://www.rfk.com
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746                     (508) 893-9889 - FAX


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/