Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:23:53 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Having problems with sshd and user accounts?  1.3.10    appears to be broken, 1.3.9 fixed it...
Message-ID: <20020315012353.GB15246@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <a6qeii$49m$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20020314101743 DOT 01ca4ff0 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <3C914380 DOT 9020508 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3C914380.9020508@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 07:42:40PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
>>Thank goodness someone has found the Cygwin release that's a panacea
>>for all subsequent Cygwin ills! I'd heard B20 touted as this for so
>>long that I was afraid Cygwin would never reach such heights again.
>>Boy am I relieved! I guess there's no need for further Cygwin releases,
>>since 1.3.9 is now the cure all (actually, this makes me wonder why
>>there were any releases after B20....) Anybody have any idea what would
>>be a good use of the newly freed
>>
>>up time of members of this group?
>
>
>LOL!

Ditto.

>Although, the XEmacs-centric crowd has been recommending "stay at
>1.3.2" for some time, now.  So unfortunately, 1.3.9 is NOT a complete
>panacea.  We *may* actually have to keep developing cygwin...mebbe
>1.3.11 will be all the juicy goodness of 1.3.2 + 1.3.9, and then we can
>stop?

Yes.  I've heard that.  They broke something in Xemacs so that it stopped
working with 1.3.3+.

I think it's ttys or maybe processes or something.  There is definitely some
kind of problem there that one of the developers should check into.  I'd
do it but I don't get paid to work on Xemacs!

I hope this helps someone track down the problem, at least.  Unfortunately
I have no more time to help and I only know how to program cygwin, myself,
anyway.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/