Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:31:05 +0100 From: "Gerrit P. Haase" X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.54 Beta/45) Business Reply-To: "Gerrit P. Haase" Organization: Esse keine toten Tiere X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <109101669262.20020314153105@familiehaase.de> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: reducing binary distribution size with UPX In-Reply-To: <3C909B8C.95763E0C@yahoo.com> References: <3C8FC440 DOT A05EA121 AT lapo DOT it> <5040918077 DOT 20020313223834 AT familiehaase DOT de> <3C909B8C DOT 95763E0C AT yahoo DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Earnie, Donnerstag, 14. März 2002 15:29:35, du schriebst: > NTFS already does on the fly compression. No other utility is needed. What about FAT drives? UPX compresses binaries about 50%! How much does NTFS on the fly compression handles? >> > What about reducing distributed exes size using UPX? >> > Has it any side-kicks on cygwni binaries? >> > Of course bz2 archives wouldn't change but installed size could. >> >> No sideeffects;) >> I'm using it since a year now. >> Fetch my binary: http://familiehaase.de/cywgin/compression/upx/ -- $ make signature make: *** No rule to make target `signature'. Stop. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/