Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: Next version of setup.exe
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 21:33:46 +1100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
Message-ID: <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA760014B84@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Next version of setup.exe
Thread-Index: AcG+t11OsTuxKaGCQFCoZ4+lC/dc9QJZxZyg
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: "Mark Himsley" <mark AT mdsh DOT com>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g2AAY6X18444

Hi Mark,
	sorry for the long delay... fiscally supported work intervened.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Himsley [mailto:mark AT mdsh DOT com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 10:16 PM
> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Re: Next version of setup.exe
> 
> 
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:01:12 +1100 you wrote:
> 
> >It is accessible via 
> >http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-20020225.exe.
> 
> Maybe the 'Locate package Directory' text box could fill the 
> width of the dialog slightly more

Patches (from anyone) accepted. 
 
> Maybe its my computer but selecting the 'Cygwin Setup' item 
> in the task bar or clicking anywhere on the dialog except for 
> the title bar does not top the dialog (it does get focus though).

It's everyones. Long term the chooser will be just-another-property page
(or something). Anyway, known bug (I'm assuming that you have the choose
open when this occurs). Can you please confirm my assumption?
 
> Using setup in two passes, one to doanload and one to 
> install. I selected to uninstall bison on the first pass, it 
> was installed and there was an update to happen. On the 
> second pass I was not able to uninstall as uninstall is not 
> one of the options but installing the latest version (which 
> was not downloaded) was in the list of options. When it got 
> to do the install there was an error indicating that the file 
> to install did not exist (which is correct). This leads me to 
> two observations: (1) what is the point of the uninstall 
> option in the download phase and (2) why did the install 
> phase offer to install a file that did not exist and did not 
> offer to uninstall that file.

'Download only' mode is a hack leveraging existing functionality, not a
truly separate mode. So it prevents installs... but apparently
uninstalls slipped through the gaps. Added as a todo-item to remove the
uninstalling, and the ability to choose that (or reinstalls).

As for the install phase, I'm not sure if this email was sent before or
after I fixed a critical bug in the local-install mode, you may find
it's fixed now.

Cheers,
Rob

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/