Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Stephano Mariani" To: "'Dockeen'" , Subject: RE: GCC 3.0.X and Cygwin Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 03:10:33 -0000 Message-ID: <001b01c1c7e1$278ee610$8047a8c0@sknet01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Read the list archives. :) If you need 3.x, build it yourself. Stephano Mariani > -----Original Message----- > From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com] On Behalf > Of Dockeen > Sent: Sunday, 10 March 2002 3:6 AM > To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: GCC 3.0.X and Cygwin > > Is there a reason why base Cygwin still uses 2.95.3 of > gcc, other than you have about 50 x 10^9 other > more important things to do than deal with the > 3 series. Is it somehow a poor match or messes > things up for Cygwin? > > Thanks, > Wayne Keen > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/