Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Dockeen" <dockeen AT mchsi DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: GCC 3.0.X and Cygwin
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 21:06:05 -0600
Message-ID: <NCBBLKKJGBJOLDFMCKFPCEBMCAAA.dockeen@mchsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

Is there a reason why base Cygwin still uses 2.95.3 of
gcc, other than you have about 50 x 10^9 other
more important things to do than deal with the
3 series. Is it somehow a poor match or messes
things up for Cygwin?

Thanks,
Wayne Keen

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/