Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020308103955.02bea8d0@dazed.lightbridge.com> X-Sender: lbohm AT dazed DOT lightbridge DOT com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 10:43:16 -0500 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Louis Bohm Subject: RE: Telneting/ftping to cygwin In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20020308092954.01cb5420@pop.ma.ultranet.com> References: <01C1C69C DOT BD86A400 DOT rafael DOT botejara AT sema DOT es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g28FkvJ04651 Anyway to get back on topic. I had cygwin.dll 1.3.10-1 so that was not the problem. I just did run set up and that updated a bunch of things. Now telnet and ftp do work. Inetutils ws one on the things I saw in the list of updated software. Thanks, Louis At 09:50 AM 3/8/2002 -0500, you wrote: >At 06:28 AM 3/8/2002, Rafael Botejara Cepeda wrote: > >Hello: > > > >I sent a mail on Feb, 26th: > >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-02/msg01390.html > > > >I had no answers! > > > >Just to be clear, posting a question doesn't guarantee an answer. It simply >let's us all know the troubles you see. I'm sure if someone had some ideas >(beyond the obvious of 'debug it yourself' ;-) ), you'd get a response. >There's no harm in interpreting a lack of response as an indication that >no one here has the answer for you, at least not at this time. > >For posterity, I'll use this post to restate the important issue again. > > >Just because you post, don't expect an answer. Even more than that, don't >let the fact that you don't get an answer get under your skin. No response >simply means no one on the list has any information they think is useful to >you. No one's hoarding information you need and jealously keeping it to >themselves. While re-posting exactly the same information about a problem >may, on occasion, result in some feedback that's helpful, it's also quite >common for such posts to annoy those who frequent this high-volume list, >causing them to become less interested in your issue. So, before posting >an issue again, please be considerate and think about whether your posting >contains any new, useful information about the problem. If not, it may be >worth some time to try to find some additional information before writing a >follow-up post. Such actions can go a long way toward finding a resolution >to the problem you're having. > > >Thanks Rafael for affording me the opportunity to use your posting to >address this assumption about the Cygwin list. Fortunately, it seems this >assumption is not common but it's still worthwhile to take a moment to >dispel the myth. > > > > > >Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com >RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com >838 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office >Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX > > >-- >Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple >Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html >Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html >FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ -- ЄЄКА`АКЄј,ИИ,јЄКА`АКЄјјЄКА`АКЄј,ИИ,јЄКА`АКЄјјЄКА`АКЄ ЄА`АLightbridge, Inc ЄА`А67 South Bedford St. ЄА`АBurlington MA 01832 ЄА`А781.359.4795 mailto:lbohm AT lightbridge DOT com ЄА`Аhttp://www.lightbridge.com ЄЄКА`АКЄј,ИИ,јЄКА`АКЄјјЄКА`АКЄј,ИИ,јЄКА`АКЄјјЄКА`АКЄ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/