Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 08:23:57 -0500 From: Jason Tishler Subject: Re: recv(..., MSG_PEEK) (was Re: fetchmail 5.9.8 and maildrop 1.3.7) In-reply-to: <20020305101407.N13590@cygbert.vinschen.de> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-followup-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-id: <20020305132357.GH1696@tishler.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i References: <20020302004512 DOT A1936 AT LOKI> <20020302160332 DOT GA1976 AT hp DOT com> <20020302221220 DOT A4040 AT LOKI> <20020303024718 DOT GB2116 AT hp DOT com> <20020303155818 DOT A3120 AT LOKI> <20020304155650 DOT GA1424 AT hp DOT com> <20020305101407 DOT N13590 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Corinna, On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 10:14:07AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:56:50AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: > > Could you comment as to whether or not the above changes would have any > > positive affects on the following? > > > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-08/msg00628.html > > No. The above change is sort of a code cleanup. I don't know how > we could workaround that Winsock problem in Cygwin. It doesn't know > from where you got the `n' parameter and it's perfectly legal for > a read() call to return a number of bytes < n. The above is what I thought. I appreciate you confirming this. I guess it is time for me to clean up my patch and submit it to fetchmail CVS for consideration... Thanks, Jason -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/