Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 09:31:46 +0000 Message-ID: <9450-Sun03Mar2002093146+0000-starksb@ebi.ac.uk> X-Mailer: 21.5 (beta2) "artichoke" XEmacs Lucid (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I); VM 7.00 under 21.5 (beta2) "artichoke" XEmacs Lucid From: David Starks-Browning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: RE: "start" for Cygwin In-Reply-To: References: On Saturday 2 Mar 02, Stephan Mueller writes: > Note though, that on Win9x, start is a standalone file (I forget if it's > start.exe or start.com) on the path. > Cygwin still supports 9x, so fears about consternation in some quarters > still apply (it's just that they're different quarters than Charles > originally had in mind :-) I use Win9x, and I don't think it's a problem for the cygutils package to introduce /usr/bin/start. People who install the cygutils package can probably figure out what's going on. My opinion, anyway. David -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/