Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri,  1 Mar 2002 12:59:42 +0000
Message-ID: <7840-Fri01Mar2002125942+0000-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: emacs 20.7.1 (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I);
	VM 7.00 under Emacs 20.7.1
From: David Starks-Browning <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: RE: Is the Cygwin 1.3.2 DLL Win 2000 compatible?
In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20020228173048.024373c8@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
References: <570DA4A1BC7DD4119AD7000629551498013E10E1 AT pjmnt11 DOT pjm DOT com>
	<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20020228173048 DOT 024373c8 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>

On Thursday 28 Feb 02, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) writes:
> David (Starks-Browning), do you think it's necessary to update this 
> FAQ entry so that it's clear that the Cygwin DLL has historically supported
> the then released versions of Windows?

Larry,

I don't understand what's wrong with the current FAQ entry.  Maybe I
misunderstand the question?

Thanks,
David



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/