Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: /usr/bin/env - Incorrect parsing of #! line? References: <8z9y4kbm DOT fsf AT online DOT no> <20020212185310 DOT GF26027 AT redhat DOT com> <3C6995F0 DOT 50400 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Organization: Private From: pjacklam AT online DOT no (Peter J. Acklam) In-Reply-To: <3C6995F0.50400@ece.gatech.edu> (Charles Wilson's message of "Tue, 12 Feb 2002 17:23:44 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.1 (i386-msvc-nt5.0.2195) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:54:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Lines: 35 Charles Wilson wrote: > Peter J. Acklam wrote: > > > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > > > Peter J. Acklam wrote: > > > > > > > [...] > > > > why does Cygwin look for the file "perl -w". No UNIX I > > > > have worked on would parse the shebang line that way. > > > > > > > Because... we're mean. > > > > > I'm new here so I don't know who you are, but I hope one can > > expect more informative responses than this gibberish. > > When Chris says "because we're mean" it *usually* means that the > original post was either > a) rude > b) accusatory > c) demanding > AND that the original poster made an incorrect analysis of their > problem, then complained about the non-existant problem, and > blamed the cygwin developers for being such idiots to make that > (non-existant) mistake. That's fair enough, and common on USENET news groups, but I really can't see how my posting falls into any of the categories you mention. Oh well, no big deal. Peter -- People say I'm indifferent, but I don't care. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/