Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3C73F7CF.7070205@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:23:59 -0500 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Ring CC: "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: ghostscript-6.51-3 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Peter Ring wrote: > Please forgive a silly question. > > I've rebuild the previous release (ghostscript-6.51-1) with X support > (mainly for use with xdvik in order to view dvi's with postscript > illustrations). > > While this were not a major hassle (just patch src/unix-gcc.mak a little, > don't forget to set XLIBS=Xt SM ICE Xext X11), are there any reason not > to release X-enabled binaries for ghostscript? Will gs then not run > without the X runtime libraries? Nope. If you link it against the X libraries, but then try to run it on a system that doesn't have those DLLs installed, you'll get "Couldn't find dynamic link library "libXFOO.dll" in {path...}" errors. ghostscript can't be distributed in X-linked form until the cygwin-xfree guys create a setup-installable set of X packages. (And perhaps, not even then; it's up to Dario) --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/