Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <01ef01c1b966$32aaed70$f400a8c0@mchasecompaq>
From: "Michael A Chase" <mchase AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
To: "David" <cupcake AT otaku DOT freeshell DOT org>
Cc: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <200202191403 DOT g1JE3tx09996 AT otaku DOT freeshell DOT org>
Subject: Re: od
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:50:56 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

----- Original Message -----
From: "David" <cupcake AT otaku DOT freeshell DOT org>
To: "Mark Himsley" <mark AT mdsh DOT com>
Cc: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 06:03
Subject: Re: od


>  > >You can see that the hex values in the last line are reversed.
>  > >I think they should be 4854 5450 000a.
>  >
>  > Only if you were on a big-endian platform.
>
> I can understand what you are saying if I interpret it to mean that
> the hex storage values on my machine WindowsNT - which I assume from
> you message is a big-endian platform - are faithfully represented
> by the output from the od -bcx display.
>
> What then surprises me is that the octal representation of this
> same storage is 110 124 124 120 which is what I would expect.
>
> It seems to me that you are suggesting that the only correct
> representation of the hex storage values would require od to
> ouput an ascii value of THPT. I reject, and od itself contradicts,
> this interpretation of the storage values as being meaningful.
>
> I urge you to reconsider your opinion and to modify od to
> output 4854 5450.

No-one here can modify how od works.  If it is really important to you, take
it up with the appropriate GNU group.  Don't expect a lot of sympathy from
them though, this behavior has been consistent for decades.
--
Mac :})
** I normally forward private questions to the appropriate mail list. **
Ask Smarter: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.htm
Give a hobbit a fish and he eats fish for a day.
Give a hobbit a ring and he eats fish for an age.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/