Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Stephano Mariani" <sk DOT mail AT btinternet DOT com>
To: "'Charles Wilson'" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Cc: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, <libtool AT gnu DOT org>
Subject: RE: Specifying a .def file for use with libtools libraries
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 20:25:26 -0000
Message-ID: <009801c1b8ba$673aa910$01000001@sknet01>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 1 (Highest)
X-MSMail-Priority: High
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
In-Reply-To: <3C715FF7.5050702@ece.gatech.edu>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Importance: High

I am using the current libtool-devel (libtool-devel 20020202-1) provided
under cygwin (updated this morning 11:?? GMT).

I have coded the package from scratch, and libtoolized... I have
AC_PREREQ(2.52) in my configure.ac.

FYI: I have read the docs, and have been using libtool for a while...
just not on windows!

Stephano Mariani

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Wilson [mailto:cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu]
> Sent: Monday, 18 February 2002 8 12
> To: Stephano Mariani
> Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com; libtool AT gnu DOT org
> Subject: Re: Specifying a .def file for use with libtools libraries
> 
> You do know that there are TWO (or more) different versions of libtool
> in the cygwin distribution, right?  One is based on libtool-1.4.2 and
> uses dlltool to generate the DLL.
> 
> The other is based on libtool-cvs(2002-02-02) and uses gcc/ld directly
> to build the DLLs.  (Note that there are TWO commands to generate
DLLs:
> "archive_cmds" and "archive_expsym_cmds".  Which one is used depends
on
> a bunch of stuff).
> 
> Finally, there's whatever version of libtool was used in the package
you
> are working on: most libtoolized packages ship with a ltmain.sh file
> already.
> 
> If you didn't explicitly re-libtoolize the package, then you are using
> whatever version of libtool the upstream maintainer used.  If you DID
> explicitly relibtoolize, then you are EITHER using 1.4.2 or
2002-02-02,
> depending on what the wrapper script detects from your configure.in/ac
file.
> 
> If you didn't understand that (what's all this about wrapper
scripts??),
> then you REALLY need to read /usr/doc/Cygwin/auto*.README,
> /usr/doc/Cygwin/libtool*.README and check out THIS email message:
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2001/msg00177.html
> 
> Now, which version of libtool are you REALLY using?
> 
> --chuck
> 
> P.S. with respect to the cygwin "devel" libtool, it is a work in
> progress.  It works for everything *I've* tried so far: "normal" C and
> C++ dlls.  I haven't attempted to hide symbols (as you are doing) so I
> can neither confirm nor deny that it works/breaks.  Of course, I don't
> know if even the OLD libtool-1.4.2 method *really* allows that, so
this
> may not be a "regression" per se.  Also, Ralf Habacker *previously*
> problems wrt KDE DLLs using the 20010531 cygwin "devel" libtool, but I
> don't know whether the 20020202 cygwin "devel" libtool fixes those
> problems for him.  (Again, this is not a regression because 1.4.2
can't
> build the KDE DLLs at all, so...)
> 
> Stephano Mariani wrote:
> 
> > Yes, I have, and unfortunately, it does not work!
> >
> > I have been looking through the source code of the libtool generated
by
> > configure... it seems that it generates an .exp file using the
following
> > command:
> >
> > /usr/bin/nm -B  .libs/libfile_somefile.o  | sed -n -e 's/^.*[
> > ]\([ABCDGISTW][ABCDGISTW]*\)[   ][
> > ]*\(_\)\([_A-Za-z][_A-Za-z0-9]*\)$/\1 \2\3 \3/p' | sed 's/.* //' |
sort
> > | uniq > .libs/libfile.exp
> >
> > And passes it to ld via gcc using -Wl,-retain-symbols-file
> > -Wl,.libs/libfile.exp
> >
> > This seems flawed to me since ld simply ignores it as far as I can
see!
> >
> > Stephano Mariani
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Charles Wilson [mailto:cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu]
> >>Sent: Monday, 18 February 2002 7 14
> >>To: Stephano Mariani
> >>Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> >>Subject: Re: Specifying a .def file for use with libtools libraries
> >>
> >>This is kindof a kluge, but try this:
> >>
> >>libname_la_LDFLAGS = foo.def <-no-undefined and other link flags>
> >>
> >>--chuck
> >>
> >>Stephano Mariani wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hello,
> >>>
> >>>Is there a way to use something similar to .def files with libtool.
> >>>
> > I
> >
> >>>have no way of limiting the export list, and the -export-symbols
> >>>
> > <file>
> >
> >>>directive in the libname_la_LDFLAGS seems not to work.
> >>>
> >>>I could go and rename all the symbols to avoid conflicts, but I
> >>>
> > would
> >
> >>>rather not... there has to be a way to do this using libtool.
> >>>
> >>>Please help! I am fast getting desperate enough to drop libtool
> >>>altogether.
> >>>
> >>>Thanks in advance,
> >>>
> >>>Stephano Mariani
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> >>>Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> >>>Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> >>>FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> 



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/