Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:21:06 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] inter-process signaling of non-special signals breaks
Message-ID: <20020214102106.P23094@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <3C6A581E DOT 8ADB6088 AT wapme-systems DOT de> <20020213164339 DOT D23094 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3C6B75F6 DOT C151D878 AT wapme-systems DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3C6B75F6.C151D878@wapme-systems.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i

On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 09:31:50AM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> Corinna, it would be great if you could investigate this signaling
> issue. I'm hardly guessing it's a problem to Cygwin even up to the
> latest release.

First check with 1.3.9 if it's still an issue.  We had some signal
related bug fixes not long ago.

If so, please create a simple testcase.  Apache is somewhat big for
a small testcase, isn't it?

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/