Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 12:57:56 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: IPv6 struct sockaddr_storage
Message-ID: <20020209175756.GK25500@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <11722421 DOT 1013189959 AT rave> <20020208224237 DOT GA8020 AT redhat DOT com> <3C645856 DOT 64AF3E14 AT lapo DOT it>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3C645856.64AF3E14@lapo.it>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 11:59:34PM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
>>>I am working on an IPv6 project.  This project includes a TCP server
>
>But again, do we have support for IPv6 yet?  Reading
>http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-08/msg00503.html seems that
>there exist an old Kame patch for IPv6 but it's not yet in the distro
>(and so not supported).

Since, AFAIK, no one has ever formally submitted the patch, it is likely not
to ever be in the cygwin distribution.

http://cygwin.com/contrib.html

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/