Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 2.117  (F2.6; T0.14; A1.42; B2.12; Q2.03)
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 07:49:31 +0000
From: "Soren Andersen" <soren_andersen AT fastmail DOT fm>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To: soren_andersen AT fastmail DOT fm
X-Epoch: 1013240971
X-Sasl-enc: C7fqFPsIRE2eozkIhZ4vSQ
Subject: Close to libiconv now?
Message-Id: <20020209074931.C5F44394099@fastmail.fm>

Hello,

With the newest autotools in the official Cygwin packages, are we now
close to being able to build gnu libiconv o-o-b?

I am trying to build gcc-3.0.3 and it suggests that i might want to
install libiconv. I understand from reading list archives that Chuck
Wilson built an experimental libiconv using some hacked autotools
support, last july. Any updates on that topic?

 Regards,
    Soren Andersen

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/