Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 22:33:56 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc-2.95.3-5.tar.bz2 is BROKEN
Message-ID: <20020208033356.GA26056@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <EIEOJCAKMFMIKEMJNANGCEIGCEAA DOT LaurenceWood AT SunyataSystems DOT Com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <EIEOJCAKMFMIKEMJNANGCEIGCEAA.LaurenceWood@SunyataSystems.Com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:41:48PM -0500, Laurence F. Wood wrote:
>The Cygwin version of gcc that currently downloads with setup
>(gcc-2.95.3-5.tar.bz2) is BROKEN!  Although I don't have time to
>specifically isoloate the problem, the compiler breaks (reporting a
>meaningless error) when compiling complex code using templates an example of
>which follows:
>
> _vertices = new Ref<Vertex>[TriInterpCoef::order_to_nvertex(_order)];
>
>Version gcc-2.95.3-4.tar.gz and earlier do not break and generate code
>correctly.
>
>By any chance did the person that broke gcc also work on (and break)
>bison-1.31-1?

Yep, that would be me.

Have fun!

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/