Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <20020207150711.25362@pat.net> Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 15:07:11 -0600 From: Pat To: David Starks-Browning Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.3.9: rsync daemon 2.5.1 broken Reply-To: pat AT pat DOT net References: <20020203123708 DOT 24309 AT pat DOT net> <20020207113819 DOT 64867 AT pat DOT net> <2939-Thu07Feb2002194035+0000-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1 In-Reply-To: <2939-Thu07Feb2002194035+0000-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>; from David Starks-Browning on Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 07:40:34PM +0000 On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 07:40:34PM +0000, David Starks-Browning wrote: > >From the rsync man page: > > --modify-window > When comparing two timestamps rsync treats the > timestamps as being equal if they are within the > value of modify_window. This is normally zero, but > you may find it useful to set this to a larger > value in some situations. In particular, when > transferring to/from FAT filesystems which cannot > represent times with a 1 second resolution this > option is useful. > > Try --modify-window=2. Let us know if that's the right solution. These files (the ones that are being unecessarily copied) haven't changed their mod times in months or years... Ah, but you mean that the representation is different on win and it can't hold the time to the same precision... I'll give it a try... I hadn't realized that. > > Basically I think rsync under cygwin is just behaving badly. > > On Win98. Not Cygwin's fault. I'm sorry to be down on rsync ;) I really want it to work but I've had lots of issues... When I'm done I'll write up a page on what I had to do to get everything working and put it up somewhere for other people. > Lapo, that might be a good thing to mention in the > /usr/doc/Cygwin/rsync-.README file. The only cygwin speific thing I noticed in the docs was a mention of the option to not fork the daemon, which it says is important on cygwin. But I didn't notice a difference. Thanks for the quick response, Pat Niemeyer Author of Learning Java, O'Reilly & Associates -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/