Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 13:55:19 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: A real fork() on NT Message-ID: <20020203185519.GA30264@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <006e01c1a96a$f60429a0$aace0544 AT CX535256D> <20020130131416 DOT D11608 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <013a01c1ab96$839eefc0$0100a8c0 AT advent02> <20020202032243 DOT GD6842 AT redhat DOT com> <00cb01c1acbf$802b31d0$0100a8c0 AT advent02> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00cb01c1acbf$802b31d0$0100a8c0@advent02> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 02:31:40PM -0000, Chris January wrote: >>I doubt that either Corinna or I want to transcribe the book for this >>mailing list. And, I'm pretty sure that neither of us has that much >>experience with the routines in the book. I did play with the >>implementation and realized that it would take quite a bit of work to >>perfect for cygwin. For one thing, it doesn't seem to concern itself >>with dlls. >> >>I don't remember if there were other issues. >Well I found that console handles aren't inherited properly under >Windows 2000, which is one major issue :-) I will continue to work on >this and see if I can come up some proof-of-concept code. What proof of concept? The book has a "proof of concept". It's the niggling details that are the problem. You'd need a real implementation to prove that it is workable. Why do I get the feeling that no one is interested in actually looking at the working code from the referenced book? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/