Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3C5AB01C.30307@syntrex.com> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 16:11:24 +0100 From: Pavel Tsekov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011126 Netscape6/6.2.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" CC: Phil Smith , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: gcc broken in 1.3.9 ? References: <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20020201095018 DOT 0241dc58 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote: > At 03:47 AM 2/1/2002, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > >>Maybe you haven't installed the gcc or binutils package. To bring >>everything back to normal just run again the setup.exe program and >>make sure you select both binutils and gcc packages. If the problem >>still persists you have to attach the output of the failing build >>and send it to the list. >> >>Phil Smith wrote: >> >> >>>After installing Cygwin 1.3.9, I found I could no longer compile any sources with gcc. I installed it on top of a Cygwin 1.3.3 installation which I have been using for many months to build successfully port new versions of gdb, tcl, tk and a very large set of application code. What might be the problem ? >>> > > > > Hm. Unless something is broken or there was a cockpit error, installing > gcc should install binutils by default via setup. Is this not the case? What if Phile left gcc in te skip state ? Well maybe I've assumed too much :( Still I hope he will provide the output of the build. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/