Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <001801c1aa0a$79b4a000$a7eb0544@CX535256D> From: "Barubary" To: References: <006e01c1a96a$f60429a0$aace0544 AT CX535256D> Subject: Re: A real fork() on NT Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 19:50:45 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Do you have any idea how to compile a program for the win32 POSIX system? If we could reverse engineer a win32 POSIX program that uses fork(), we could see the raw NT commands to do it. -- Barubary ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher January" To: Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:03 AM Subject: Re: A real fork() on NT > Coincidentally, I was looking into a similar thing myself. Windows NT has a > POSIX subsystem that's capable of doing fork()'s so it is obviously possible. > Have you any ideas of the arguments passed to the function or what it returns? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/