Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 20:49:43 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cygwin port of rsync -- patch for Win2k (rsync 2.5.1)
Message-ID: <20020131014943.GE22296@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <3C581EC5 DOT 20100 AT rochester DOT rr DOT com> <3C587F40 DOT FB1EED18 AT lapo DOT it> <20020131014357 DOT GC22296 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020131014357.GC22296@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 08:43:57PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 12:18:24AM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
>I am not saying that there can't be a problem but the analysis that the
                                    ^
                             some other kind of
>parent process is closing something in the child really can't be
>correct.
>
>As always, I'd appreciate debugging of this situation.  It's a given
>that one doesn't implicitly have knowledge.  You have to gain knowledge
>by looking at the code and running the debugger.  The techniques in
>the file how-to-debug-cygwin.txt should provide you with ways to get
>started.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/