Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 23:27:27 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Locating bzip2 package Message-ID: <20020130042727.GA5211@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <858788618A93D111B45900805F85267A047D64AA AT caexmta3 DOT amd DOT com> <20020130025549 DOT GD32762 AT redhat DOT com> <3C57701E DOT 5080802 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020130042531 DOT GA4645 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020130042531.GA4645@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 11:25:31PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 11:01:34PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >>The fact is, these groupings (Utils, Development, Archive, etc) will >>never please everybody -- and if someone is missing a tool that they >>want, and can't find it in the "categories" list...it seems obvious (to >>me, at least) that the user should run setup again and check out the >>'Full' package list -- which is alphabetically organized, without those >>pesky categories -- for the desired item. (run on sentence, anyone?) > >Except that there is no "Full" list yet. Isn't that a feature of newer >setup.exe's? Nevermind. You meant the "Full" View. Sorry. I'm always much smarter ten seconds after hitting the send button... cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/