Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3C573BFC.9000907@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:19:08 -0500 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hin-tak DOT leung AT idl-bt DOT com CC: janneke AT gnu DOT org, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: New on sourceware: texmf-20000804-2 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hmmm...that means the setup.hint file for tetex-20001208-4 is incomplete. The maintainer needs to add 'libpng2' to the "requires:" line. --Chuck hin-tak DOT leung AT idl-bt DOT com wrote: > Just to confirm that with the latest tetex-20001208-4 > and the cygwin texmf-*-* packages I don't need to > set TEXMFMAIN anymore - although I still have > TEXINPUTS and the font related variables set to > "${HOME}/somewhere//:" for my CJK stuff. > > Well-done! > > BTW - pdftex in tetex-20001208-4 depends on the > new (10-days-old) libpng 1.0.2 . One needs to > upgrade that first - or run the > /etc/postinstall/*{tetex,texmf}* > scripts again after ungrading libpng. Re-installing > tetex will not re-run the postinstall script for > some unknown reason. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:janneke AT gnu DOT org] > Sent: 29 January 2002 13:46 > To: hin-tak DOT leung AT idl-bt DOT com > Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: Re: New on sourceware: texmf-20000804-2 > > > hin-tak DOT leung AT idl-bt DOT com writes: > > >>My Texmf tree came from the stock teTeX 1.0.2 >> > > Ok, so you're not using the texmf packages, and not using the latest > tetex-beta... > > >>Without setting TEXMFMAIN, it looks like latex is trying to look for >>the texmf tree under //share rather than /usr/share . >> > > Could be. > > >>"TEXMFMAIN = $SELFAUTOPARENT/share/texmf" and my guess is that >>$SELFAUTOPARENT is not set correctly, but this is the only file >> > > Could also be. > > >>and I can see why the cygwin binaries shouldn't be able to do it >>correctly... >> > > The latest (experimental) tetex-beta + texmf-base packages should get > this right. You may be looking at bugs that have been fixed, or you > may have some other problem. Hard to tell. > > Jan. > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/