Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3002691ACB39D51180FC004854506BCA22CE04@mailserv.molienergy.bc.ca>
From: Jan Reimers <janr AT molienergy DOT com>
To: "'Mack Lobell'" <macklobell AT hotmail DOT com>, gcc AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org,
   cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: RE: Problems building cross compiler on NT
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:22:29 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="ISO-8859-1"

Try turning off the -pedandic flag when building, this should stop gcc
2.95.x from complaining about DOS line feeds.

JR

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mack Lobell [mailto:macklobell AT hotmail DOT com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:31 AM
> To: gcc AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org; cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: RE: Problems building cross compiler on NT
> 
> 
> OK, i'll buy that.
> 
> How do i get a gcc 3.X on cygwin? My current version is
> $ gcc -v
> Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/2.95.3-5/specs
> gcc version 2.95.3-5 (cygwin special)
> 
> I have tried to build 3.0, 3.0.1, 3.0.2 and 3.0.3 and they 
> all fail. I have 
> searched for binaries for cygwin but not found any.
> 
> Any hints on where i can find binaries?
> 
> 
> >From: "Chet Simpson" <digitalasp AT yahoo DOT com>
> >To: "'Neil Booth'" <neil AT daikokuya DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>, "'Mack Lobell'" 
> ><macklobell AT hotmail DOT com>
> >CC: <gcc AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
> >Subject: RE: Problems building cross compiler on NT
> >Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:28:39 -0700
> >
> >
> > > Mack Lobell wrote:-
> > >
> > > Huh?  As far as I'm aware, that's not a diagnostic that
> > > 3.0.3's preprocessor gives.  After all, a carriage return in
> > > a preprocessing directive is quite normal; it ends it!
> > >
> > > Is the bootstrap compiler 2.x?  If so, you might want to try
> > > 3.0.3 itself.
> > >
> > > Neil.
> >
> >Actually the problem stems from the fact that insn-flags.h 
> is generated
> >with symbolics:
> >
> >#define SOME_SYMBOLIC
> >\
> >Symbolic_definition_here();
> >
> >
> >Where 2.95.3 generated them as:
> >
> >#define SOME_SYMBOLIC \
> >Symbolic_definition_here();
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >...Chet...
> >
> >
> >_________________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
> 

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/