Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: From: Sava Zxivanovich To: "'Corinna Vinschen'" Subject: RE: Binutil compatibulity Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 16:03:16 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Thanks. > -----Original Message----- > From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com] > Sent: 24 January 2002 15:45 > To: Sava Zxivanovich > Cc: 'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com' > Subject: Re: Binutil compatibulity > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 03:34:56PM -0000, Sava Zxivanovich wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I am working with PowerPC 401 D2 - in deed PLX IOP480. > > > > I have installed GCC chain that uses binutil 2.9.1, gcc 2.95.2 for > > powerpc-elf. > > Due to fact that as in that version do not support one > operand - tlbwe, > > I have to upgrade to one I hope does support - 2.10.1. I > would not like > > to use 2.11, I had quit a bad time with it (and GCC 3.0.1). > > > > My question is if binutil 2.10 does support operand tlwbe (PowerPC > > Embedded Environment, PowerPC 401D2), would there be any > problem if I > > configure binutils as ppc-eabi (I suppose yes, I would like just to > > check that) and would it be any problem with gcc 2.95.2 (I > suppose not, > > but you never know). > > > > Why am I asking all this? Well, we are very near to a point where we > > would go with commercial compiler. Actually, this is a last > cry before > > that. > > Wrong mailing list. > > You should try binutils AT sources DOT redhat DOT com > > Corinna > > -- > Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails > regarding Cygwin to > Cygwin Developer > mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Red Hat, Inc. > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/