Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 16:45:13 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: Sava Zxivanovich Cc: "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" Subject: Re: Binutil compatibulity Message-ID: <20020124164513.C11608@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: Sava Zxivanovich , "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 03:34:56PM -0000, Sava Zxivanovich wrote: > Hi. > > I am working with PowerPC 401 D2 - in deed PLX IOP480. > > I have installed GCC chain that uses binutil 2.9.1, gcc 2.95.2 for > powerpc-elf. > Due to fact that as in that version do not support one operand - tlbwe, > I have to upgrade to one I hope does support - 2.10.1. I would not like > to use 2.11, I had quit a bad time with it (and GCC 3.0.1). > > My question is if binutil 2.10 does support operand tlwbe (PowerPC > Embedded Environment, PowerPC 401D2), would there be any problem if I > configure binutils as ppc-eabi (I suppose yes, I would like just to > check that) and would it be any problem with gcc 2.95.2 (I suppose not, > but you never know). > > Why am I asking all this? Well, we are very near to a point where we > would go with commercial compiler. Actually, this is a last cry before > that. Wrong mailing list. You should try binutils AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/